PUNITIVE FAIRNESS AND THE FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE: KOREA’S CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND THE 2024 ALTERNATIVE SERVICE DECISIONS IN LIGHT OF ICCPR ARTICLE 18

Andrew Mintz June 22, 2026

Home » PUNITIVE FAIRNESS AND THE FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE: KOREA’S CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND THE 2024 ALTERNATIVE SERVICE DECISIONS IN LIGHT OF ICCPR ARTICLE 18

Sueng Yeun Oh | 12 Regent J. Glob. Just. & Pub. Pol’y 157 (2026)

Download PDF

Volume-12-Oh

Journal of Global Justice and Public Policy Volume 12 No Comments

Next PostBEHIND BARS, WITHIN BOUNDS: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DENYING GENDER-AFFIRMING SURGERIES IN PRISONS

PUNITIVE FAIRNESS AND THE FREEDOM OF CONSCIENCE: KOREA’S CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND THE 2024 ALTERNATIVE SERVICE DECISIONS IN LIGHT OF ICCPR ARTICLE 18

Next PostBEHIND BARS, WITHIN BOUNDS: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DENYING GENDER-AFFIRMING SURGERIES IN PRISONS

Recommended For You

BEHIND BARS, WITHIN BOUNDS: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF DENYING GENDER-AFFIRMING SURGERIES IN PRISONS

FAITH, FINANCE, AND FEDERAL POLICY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE CHILD TAX CREDIT SUNSET PROVISION OF THE TAX CUTS AND JOBS ACT

DO CHILDREN HAVE RIGHTS? INTERNATIONAL AND DOMESTIC APPROACHES TO THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN